[lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning

[Frédéric Bernon]

Follow-up Comment #8, task #6827 (project lwip):

The problem is more to know if it's need to improve that or not. If your
device mainly send to one destination, the current patch is enough. If you
receive lot of packets, maintain the hash table can cost a lot. So, I think
it's dependant of the use of the stack.

Except that, replace "arp_table[i]" by a pointer should have a high cost. But
like each change, do some measures can help to decide if the patch is good or
no...


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6827>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/