Re: [Ltib] Re: Changing ltib base dir

[John Koleszar]

Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
> 
>> Hi Kumar,
>>
>> I would be worried about making it / as this would make the host support
>> packages (that go into /opt/freescale/ltib) overwrite the host you are
>> installed on.  Also the LPP would end up as /pkgs, which again probably
>> is not idea.
> 
> I'm not suggesting /, but /opt (this we'd get /opt/ltib and /opt/pkgs)
> 

/opt/ltib and /opt/pkgs don't conform to the FHS. I can understand the desire to
remove the freescale reference, but I think unless you're going to move all the
files currently under /opt/freescale to a more standardized layout, you really
need an extra directory layer to encapsulate them. Simply renaming
/opt/freescale to /opt/ltib might be sufficient (though /opt/ltib/ltib is ugly).
But presuming to "own" a directory as generic as /opt/pkgs is unwise.

-- John