[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A companion interpreted language for @Filter clause
From: |
Giovanni Zezza |
Subject: |
Re: A companion interpreted language for @Filter clause |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Jan 2000 13:21:20 +0100 |
Il Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:53:46 -0800 , address@hidden scriveva:
>I find that using Python to generate Lout code is pretty fun and extremely
>flexible.
Yes, I do something like myself (though my language of choice is Perl, and
my Page Definition Language target was usually, so far, RTF; I was thinking
to substitute it with TeX or LaTeX, but Lout is possibly a better
candidate); especially when writing documents and reports from a database.
It isn't though, for me at least, the ultimate solution (otherwise maybe by
now I would have written a Perl2PostScript filter and stopped all this
TeX-LaTeX-Lout-Whatever affaire). The other way around is usually a more
comfortable path in normal document production.
>It isn't too hard to embed an interpreter for those languages which are
>embeddable like Tcl, Python and Perl. But it is a bit of work and requires
>extra compilation, and of course is difficult to please everybody by
>choosing only one.
Well.... not if that one would be Perl. ;-)
Yes, I know my proposal isn't luckily to be realized in a politically (if
even in a technically) correct way. Just one of those sorts of things you
can't help to think at, no matter whether possible or not.
Ciao.