[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linphone-developers] ICE implementation

From: Ghislain MARY
Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] ICE implementation
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:59:36 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0

Hi Eugene,

ICE in liblinphone uses the first route for which the media is confirmed to be passing in both ways correctly. As described in the RFC the connectivity checks start with the local candidates. This means that usually the route that would be used first is the p2p one that is also usually the route with the better latency.
There is currently no way to customize this behavior.


On 03/14/2016 09:28 AM, Eugene Punsal Lozada wrote:
Question about ICE implementation in Liblinphone

1) What's the current logic on how ICE chooses its candidate IPs? How does it prioritize ? (e.g. prioritize direct p2p or perhaps detected latency)

2) Is there any way to customize this behavior?


Linphone-developers mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]