Le ven. 6 oct. 2023 à 15:19, Werner LEMBERG <
wl@gnu.org> a écrit :
> All of LilyPond's dependencies definitely are GPLv3-compatible (or
> we could not distribute official binaries on lilypond.org).
I don't have access to my old Mac in the next days, but there is a
possibility to actually check that in more detail. One of the
MacPorts maintainers, Joshua Root, wrote the following some time ago
on the 'macports-users' list:
> List which ports do and don't have an archive available (for your
> current OS version and arch):
> <https://gist.github.com/jmroot/f524dcfe5fdadcd8b7a9c2e46151e0d4>
>
> List which ports are and aren't considered distributable:
> <https://gist.github.com/jmroot/f84c329919356bfb1ed2d8425f3cfebb>
Maybe somebody who is using MacPorts can run those two TCL scripts and
report back, especially the second one? If LilyPond doesn't appear in
the non-distributable list it should be possible to ask the MacPorts
maintainers to actively switch on binary-package generation. If this
can be done, installation of LilyPond should be *much* faster on
MacPorts.
It's in the non-distributable list:
not-distributable.txt:lilypond "lilypond" is not distributable because its license "GPL-3+" conflicts with license "GPL-2" of dependency "libpaper"
not-distributable.txt:lilypond-devel "lilypond-devel" is not distributable because its license "GPL-3+" conflicts with license "GPL-2" of dependency "libpaper"
The first script is still running. I will report when it ends.