[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?
From: |
karl |
Subject: |
Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly? |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 00:06:41 +0100 (CET) |
David Kastrup:
> Michael Ellis <address@hidden> writes:
...
> > The MuseScore output is correct and matches the tempo and meter items
> > embedded in the original midi file (attached). I've also verified with 2
> > different
> > DAW's (Reaper and Logic X) that the midi file is imported correctly.
The midi file matches your msc2-meter-example.png, I can show you
(Michael) a dump if you like.
> > The application that produced the midi file is called tbon. It's a
> > shorthand notation
> > language I wrote for projects where fast notation entry is more important
> > than
> > having the full capabilities of LilyPond. If you're curious about tbon, go
> > to
> > https://github.com/Michael-F-Ellis/tbon . The README has a link to a live
> > online
> > demo.
Nice idea to have c--c mean c8. c16 which is much more error prone to
type.
You could probably change your python program to output lilypond code
directly.
> > I'd really rather use LP than MuseScore for the times when I want to
> > engrave the
> > output from tbon since LP still produces better looking scores, imo, but
> > not being
> > able to handle meter changes is a showstopper.
>
> I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar checks
> that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout.
And here with 2.19.16.
The bar checks fails because midi2ly puts in barchecks in the wrong
places, don't know why.
///
Regarding your subject line question, I don't know.
I make my own midi -> ly converter though, currently in an experimental
leap...
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57