[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly? |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Dec 2017 23:15:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Ellis <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi, It's been a few years since my last post here. I'm wondering about the
> status of
> midi2ly. I just tried the version that came with 2.18.2 and it seems to
> handle meter
> changes incorrectly. Here's a short example produced from a midi file
> imported into
> MuseScore 2.1
>
> msc2-meter-example.png
>
> and here's the result of processing what midi2ly produced from the same file
>
> ly-meter-example.png
>
> The MuseScore output is correct and matches the tempo and meter items
> embedded in the original midi file (attached). I've also verified with 2
> different
> DAW's (Reaper and Logic X) that the midi file is imported correctly.
>
> The application that produced the midi file is called tbon. It's a shorthand
> notation
> language I wrote for projects where fast notation entry is more important than
> having the full capabilities of LilyPond. If you're curious about tbon, go to
> https://github.com/Michael-F-Ellis/tbon . The README has a link to a live
> online
> demo.
>
> I'd really rather use LP than MuseScore for the times when I want to engrave
> the
> output from tbon since LP still produces better looking scores, imo, but not
> being
> able to handle meter changes is a showstopper.
I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar checks
that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout.
--
David Kastrup