Re: elegant compound time signatures

[Graham Percival]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:34:35PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Hans: at the risk of sounding grumpy, did you try compiling my
> > example?  I believe it does everything you want.
> 
> One thing your snippet doesn't display -- time signatures of the form,
> 
> 3+3+2
>   8
> 
> Is this possible?

Yes, see the very first message in this thread!

> There are some other weird ones that I remember from e.g. Le marteau
> sans ma??tre, but off the top of my head I can't recall exactly the
> written form.  Practically, they corresponded to time signatures like
> 4/6 (i.e. 4 triplet crotchets/quarter notes), but they were written
> differently.
> 
> Are there options here?  (I already know that weird-but-'normal' time
> signatures like 7/10, 4/6 etc. will work.)

Again, see the first message in this thread, or even better, the
"improved elegant time signatures" (or some similar subject) email
I sent a few hours later.

Cheers,
- Graham