[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: multimeasure rests with proper measure numbering
From: |
Steve Schow |
Subject: |
RE: multimeasure rests with proper measure numbering |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:16:00 -0700 |
Thanks for the simple example and see the measure numbering is retained
correctly this way. But I still do not understand how I can have the conductor
score have EMPTY measures when the whole measure is a rest (but not hide the
rests in measures that have notes).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:address@hidden
>
> I think you are missing something very basic and I hope the following
> example can help you realize how to use multimeasure rests.
> It's always much easier to get relevant answers if you include
> an example (preferably short but complete) of the LilyPond code you
> have tried.
>
> m = \relative c'{
> c1 | d | e | f | R1*4 \break | g1 | f | e | d |
> }
>
> % Conductors score:
> \score{
> \new StaffGroup <<
> \new Staff \m
> >>
> }
>
> % Instrumental part:
> \score{
> \new Staff {\set Score.skipBars = ##t \m }
> }
>
> As you can see, the bar numbering is correct in both versions of the
> music.
>
>