Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?

[Rick Hansen (aka RickH)]

Thanks Kieren,

Yes, now I see it is happening on my left oriented string numbers, and
arpeggios too.  I think I'll wait for a more global fix from a developer,
(even if I have to try to do one of those complicated "call back" fixes),
rather than spend a week re-editing every measure and all future work. 
Maybe this post belongs on the bug list, pretty serious IMO.

Rick




Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> 
> Hi, Rick!
> 
>> There is a problem with notes that both start a measure and have an  
>> accidental.
>> [...] I can't be the first one to notice it).
> 
> If you search the archives, you'll see that I've asked this question  
> a number of times.
> And it's also true of other "left-side attachements", e.g., arpeggios.
> 
> I've yet to receive a satisfactory response/solution/explanation.  =\
> 
> What I've been doing in the meantime is manually tweaking the X- 
> extent of the Accidental (or BarLine) to force the padding, e.g.
> 
>      \once \override Accidental #'X-extent = #'(-2 . 1) bs
> 
> It's definitely a time-consuming process, but I haven't found a  
> better solution -- if you find one, I'd greatly appreciate hearing  
> about it!  =)
> 
> Best,
> Kieren.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Minimum-padding-after-barlines-for-notes-with-accidentals--tf2265851.html#a6287966
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.