[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hi
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2020 17:35:02 -0700 |
Retaining define-markup-command-internal in order to allow defining
markups in LilyPond syntax in a manner that stops being supported from
Scheme seems like incoherent design.
markup-lambdas can be created from within LilyPond using \markup ...
\etc . Having them unusable from Scheme for the purpose of defining a
markup function seems inappropriate.
If unsupporting the functionality via define-markup-command is desirable
(which I am not convinced of) or independently, it would seem that a
more regular/prominent module-define-markup-command! with appropriate
semantics would be warranted (and used from the parser) instead of
retaining define-markup-command-internal as a non-internal of
define-markup-command.
https://codereview.appspot.com/577720043/
- Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden),
dak <=
- Re: Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/03/28
- Re: Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/03/29
- Re: Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/03/29
- Re: Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/03/29
- Re: Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/03/30
- Re: Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/03/30