Re: Define Scheme markups using define-public (issue 577720043 by address@hidden)

[hanwenn]

On 2020/03/29 13:52:48, hanwenn wrote:
> retain existing

how's this? This leaves things backward compatible.

Note that we're currently incoherent, because you can't do 

 (let ((n 0)) (define sym val))

so coherency is probably not a great argument for keeping things as is.


https://codereview.appspot.com/577720043/