[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by a
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:13:57 -0800 |
On 2020/02/21 17:03:07, hanwenn wrote:
> make baseline:
>
> 1.8:
> real 3m41.714s
> user 6m52.414s
> sys 0m36.662s
>
> 2.2:
> real 6m8.344s
> user 12m51.799s
> sys 0m34.875s
>
> I think this warrants some deeper look, though: I have the impression
that the
> lilypond-book regression tests aren't parallelized. They also suffer
from the
> higher start up costs (there are some 60 of them, so that's 90 seconds
right
> there).
I recently found some "could not contact jobserver" in the logs from
make and googling it suggested that this is a consequence of using
$(MAKE) rather than $$(MAKE) inside of macros (causing premature or too
much expansion?). I have not investigated yet and don't know what
counts as "macro" here. Or whether this is all nonsense. Either way,
it should affect Guile-2 just as much as Guile-1.8, shouldn't it?
https://codereview.appspot.com/569390043/
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), (continued)
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden),
dak <=
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/21
- Re: Accept GUILE 2 without extra configure options (issue 569390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/21