lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remaining sprint for the release of version 2.20


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Remaining sprint for the release of version 2.20
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:10:30 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Jonas Hahnfeld <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi David,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.02.2020, 00:44 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Whatever else may be on the plate, the immediate problem to be put
>> behind us right now is the release of 2.20.
>
> fantastic!
>
>> I put specifically the
>> translation team and Werner into Cc.  The translation team should check
>> what changes of the recent release of 2.19.84 they still need to get
>> track of.
>> 
>> Werner basically is the person most affected by changes I have not yet
>> cherry-picked because of problems, changes that likely would be a good
>> idea to have in 2.20.
>> 
>> Those are his extensive indexing review, and reworks of several
>> examples.  The indexing review is hard to apply to the by now
>> significantly from master diverged stable/2.20, and with the reworks of
>> the examples I am not sure whether they need to be accompanied by
>> changes to the lilypond-extra archive.  At some point of time, there has
>> been such a requirement; I was not sure whether it persisted.  If I am
>> assured that this is either not an issue, or that lilypond-extra will
>> get the necessary treatment until we can release 2.20 (hopefully in a
>> week or so), I can do the required cherry-picking myself.
>> 
>> So let's make sure we get our last ducks in a row for closing that
>> long-awaited chapter.
>
> Do you still plan to pick the doc updates you mentioned in your last
> email? See my response for how to do so without too much pain:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2020-02/msg00032.html

Ah right, the command line stuff.  I'll take a look.  But I'd really
need feedback about Stockhausen et al from whoever knows how the images
make it into the doc and/or web pages on what would be the right way to
process/include them these days.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]