[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden)
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2020 11:29:47 -0500 |
On Jan 24, 2020, at 11:11, address@hidden wrote:
>> Don't assume the hash function is perfect: create the table with more
> buckets,
>> say 2*size.
>
> I'd not do that. It's second-guessing the implementation. The size
> should be good as a hint. In particular if there are actual
> duplicates...
You are right. I hadn't read the documentation closely enough. The
constructor argument is a minimum bucket count.
- Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/01/24
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden),
Dan Eble <=
- Re: Simplify and speed up uniquify (issue 583390043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/01/25