Re: Python 3

[Jonas Hahnfeld]

Am Samstag, den 21.09.2019, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> >> Well, I prefer a series of patches instead of a single patch.
> 
> > 
> 
> > Ok, I'll split the third one.  My concern was that a single part of
> 
> > the series won't bring any benefit on its own.  So for example only
> 
> > changing the division operator will not make musicxml2ly work with
> 
> > Python 3.
> 
> 
> In case there are patches within a series of patches that don't
> compile, please say that in the commit message for the benefit of `git
> bisect'.  I think it is better to have smaller, easily comprehensible
> but probably uncompilable changes than a single, working chunk that is
> hard to read.

All patches in the progress of porting to Python 3 won't fully work
until all remaining issues are fixed.
That said, I've split the third patch ("Fix musicxml2ly with Python 3")
into four smaller logical groups. I don't really mind which version is
applied, the outcome is the same.

Regards,
Jonas

0001-musicxml-Replace-new.classobj-by-type-for-Python-3.patch
Description: Text Data

0002-musicxml2ly-Fix-calls-to-functions-from-string.patch
Description: Text Data

0003-musicxml2ly-Fix-handling-of-encoded-data.patch
Description: Text Data

0004-musicxml2ly-Fix-integer-calculations-for-Python-3.patch
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part