[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stabl
From: |
Knut Petersen |
Subject: |
Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:56:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.2 |
On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote:
Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group. Does that seem the best way forward?
In rsync-lily-doc.py we have:
system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links --delay-updates
--delete --delete-after --stats --progress -pgorltvu -e ssh . %s/%s/' %
(options.destination, branch_dir))
In rsync-test.py we have:
system ('rsync --hard-links --delay-updates --delete --delete-after --stats
--progress -pgorltvu -e ssh . %s/%s/' % (options.destination, target))
Group and ownership are preserved here. But "preserved" means that the numeric
group / user id is preserved, not the literal name mapped to the GID/UID on the two
systems.
I think you first need to find out what numeric UID/GID is expected for the
files on the upload server. Then create a lilypond group with the proper GID
and try again ... maybe something similar is necessary if a specific UID is
expected.
Knut
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], (continued)
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch],
Knut Petersen <=
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Karlin High, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], John Mandereau, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/23
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], John Mandereau, 2019/03/20