Re: Moving a number of C++ constructs to SCM

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> This is a sequence of patches.  The first one is just the same as the
> already submitted issue 4840 (so that this can be tested on master):
> it did not make sense to disentangle the bulk of this work from that
> change.

It is the very definition of madness to try the same thing over and over
again and expect a different outcome.

My last try of git-cl worked.  I have no idea why but it produced issue
4841.  So please do not bother submitting this patch series in my stead,
I might be able to submit it on my own.  Also I think that I spotted
another opportunity for simplification that I want to follow up on.  So
this version is not likely to be final.

-- 
David Kastrup