Re: LSR updates

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: LSR updates


> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > OK - running makelsr on current master does not touch any files, and
> > they all have the wrong address.  I propose to rerun my script, only
> > changing the address of the LSR this time...
> >
> > I'll then update the LSR itself: there are now only 7 /new snippets
> > that don't compile with 2.18.2, so this will slim that directory down
> > substantially.  They are:
> >
> > broken-crescendo-hairpin.ly
> > flat-flags-and-beam-nibs.ly
> > making-an-object-invisible-with-the-transparent-property.ly
> > modifying-tuplet-bracket-length.ly
> > non-traditional-key-signatures.ly
> > staff-headword.ly
> > unfretted-headword.ly
> >
> > AFAICS they all fail under 2.18 because of the isolated note values.
>
> In which case the \version header should point to 2.19.

They do: I was just checking whether they also fail for syntax reasons. 
There is one snippet that has a 2.19 version but still compiles under 2.18.

> Perhaps look at
> the history of those snippets in snippets/new.  If they have a version
> before the "isolated duration" change, that's possibly LSR material.

I don't understand what you mean by this: could you elaborate?

--
Phil Holmes