[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:05:40 -0700 |
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:47 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> If the beam/stems were mirror images of each other, the noteheads in the
> left group would be closer to the beams than the noteheads in the right
> group since the noteheads are attached to the right of the stems rather
> than being centered on them.
>
Wow, I never knew that feature. How refined!
> It would be an interesting question whether one should actually
> disregard this in the distance calculations in order to avoid
> quantization introducing "symmetry artifacts" like this. Or perhaps do
> a mixed strategy: make distances that would provide the proper clearance
> regardless of whether the notehead would be attached to the right or the
> left of the stem.
>
Of those two ideas, I prefer the second, but now that I understand the
functionality, I'm willing to leave this as it is.
Thanks for the clarification.
- Mark
- \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, Mark Polesky, 2014/07/01
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, David Kastrup, 2014/07/02
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, Paul Morris, 2014/07/02
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, Mark Polesky, 2014/07/03
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, David Kastrup, 2014/07/03
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, Mark Polesky, 2014/07/03
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, Abel Cheung, 2014/07/03
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, Mark Polesky, 2014/07/03
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, Abel Cheung, 2014/07/03
- Re: \magnifyMusic stem-length enigma, David Kastrup, 2014/07/03