[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102)
From: |
tdanielsmusic |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102) |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:09:10 +0000 |
On 2012/11/27 00:10:24, dak wrote:
On 2012/11/26 21:53:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I think you've chosen the best way forward here.
Calling a strategic retreat "the best way forward" might
be putting a bit of a spin on it.
:)
It would have been prohibitively costly for the ground
forces to secure the conquered areas.
Indeed. Ensuring the flanks are adequately covered
before advancing is often forgotten in the excitement
of battle.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6851102/
- Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102), tdanielsmusic, 2012/11/25
- Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102), thomasmorley65, 2012/11/25
- Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102), tdanielsmusic, 2012/11/26
- Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102), dak, 2012/11/26
- Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102), tdanielsmusic, 2012/11/26
- Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102), dak, 2012/11/26
- Re: Issue 2916: Document \hide and \omit (issue 6851102),
tdanielsmusic <=