[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:02:37 +0100 |
Le mardi 24 novembre 2009 à 21:20 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> On the 16th, I gave up and fixed this one myself. However, I
> discovered that I couldn't copy files from srcdir into the blddir
> without changing their name, which kind-of borks
> Documentation/pictures/.
I'm quite certain we can avoid copying pictures from outdir to blddir;
however, if more generally we can't transform a file in srcdir to a file
in blddir that has the same name, let's sit down two minutes to see why
we do this. It's not for making the pictures available to Texinfo
formatters, as a simple -I srcdir (which we already have in current
build system IIRC) would do the job. For some pictures, we resize them,
but then for clarity we could give a different name to the source. For
other pictures, IIRC we just symlink them so that they're caught by
mirrortree (a module used by www_post.py that links files into *-root).
Is it worth going on investigating this? I think so, so I'll have a
look.
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
- Re: serious doubts about waf, (continued)
- [PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/25