[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:42:05 +0100 |
Sorry for the delay, it often takes me a while to catch all traffic on
Lily lists when I'm back from a trip, even a few-days one.
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 17:54 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> 1) if you can't duplicate the problem after checking out
> dev/gperciva, then I'll check a third time to see if there's any
> old version of waf floating around on this machine.
No, I couldn't duplicate. But, it might be necessary to clear some
cache using distclean, then reconfigure, so you can have a command like
waf-light distclean configure build
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
[PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/25