[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:40:05 -0200 |
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> It's no problem at all, if you do it that way.
>
> Hello merge conflict, my old friend, I've come to talk with you again...
>
> If you have ever worked in a project with a central ChangeLog file, you
> know the permanent hassle with switching branches when some changes
> require entries in a central file.
this is exactly why do not have a central ChangeLog file.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., (continued)
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Neil Puttock, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again.,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22