[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:37:38 -0200 |
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I have no idea what I am doing here. In particular not with the
> \override, and the set-object-property!. Can somebody explain to me
> just what data structures I happen to manipulate, and how a user is
> actually _supposed_ to be mangling them?
Perhaps you could explain us how accordion notation works; that will
make it easier to give advice on how to best achieve your targets.
As far as I can see, there are 2 settings:
- the type of accordion (eg defaultStdBassV), which typically span
multiple notes, or even the entire piece?
- the register of a note. Is that specific for one note or for multiple notes?
is that correct?
Given the register of the note and the type of the accordion, you want
to create a specific symbol on top of a given note, correct?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., (continued)
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
Re: Code review/discussion time again.,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=