[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: developers developers developers
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: developers developers developers |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:51:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:25:40PM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>> Good visual debugger for both scheme and C++, running well on Windows and
>> Linux.
>
> That'll take... oh, 200 hours? Sorry, but that would probably
> take all the lilypond programmers over a year to write. I don't
> think that's a good trade-off.
A good hint about how to work interactively with top-repl takes quite
less time and already helps a lot.
>> Easy build procedure using visual tools.
>
> Another 200 hours or more. Again, I can't see that trade-off being
> worth it.
For me, "visual tools" are a setback, actually.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: developers developers developers, (continued)
- Re: developers developers developers, Johannes Schindelin, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Francisco Vila, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Chris Snyder, 2009/11/12