[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: developers developers developers
From: |
demery |
Subject: |
Re: developers developers developers |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:47 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.16 |
> Yes, that suffice if you are looking for text.
> But if you are looking for function and class definition, reference,
> exception throwing places, macro expansion as tooltip etc. There are a
> lot of things a good development environment must do for effective work.
XCode does a good job for me of finding objc method invocations and
definitions (even in apples headers files). not using it for C or C++ at
the moment.
-(void) drawEachFoo: (NSArray*) fooList inRect: (NSRect) visibleBounds{...}
is found by typing a comment with the text - drawEachFoo:inRect: select
the whole phrase, right-click and select 'JumpToDefinition' as I mentioned
in a previous posting. Fast, looks up the method definition in a symbol
table kept by the project. Only works for project-registered files tho.
If the symbol is known to be apples (eg, it has an NS prefix) then its
even simp0ler, option-2x click the symbol and apples docs are searched to
produce a list in the doc browser.
--
Dana Emery
- Re: developers developers developers, (continued)
- Re: developers developers developers, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Johannes Schindelin, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers,
demery <=
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/13
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Francisco Vila, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/12