[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:59:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:53:55PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Graham
> Percival<address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:15:36PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> This is completely backwards: the definition of a stable release (or
> >> rather: stable branch), is that it is bugfix only.
> >
> > Well, we have a month or two of bugfixes only.
>
> Right - I am not saying that there must be a lot of work going on in
> the stable branch, it's just that it is not intended to be stagnant.
Ok, I think we've reached some agreements: I wouldn't say that the
stable branch is *intended* to be stagnant, either. If somebody
wants to backport things and make releases, I certainly won't
complain!
Cheers,
- Graham
- stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/08
- Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs, Graham Percival, 2009/06/09
- Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/09
- Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs, Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/06/11
- Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs, Graham Percival, 2009/06/09
- Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/10
Re: stable/2.12 and tagging of tarballs, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/09