Re: mergin web/ with master/

[Andrew Hawryluk]

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Graham
Percival<address@hidden> wrote:
> Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
> I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
>
> PRO:
> + one less branch/repo to track
> + easier to fix typos in the web pages
> + we can direct everybody to look at the CG (no more README in the
> newweb/ branch)
> + allows better integration with the other docs (this is more a
> post-GOP feature)
>
> CON:
> - adds 30 megs to the main branch (including the .git dir)
> - makes translations harder?  (maybe?  ... I don't know if this is
>  true, but IMO this is the only real reason to avoid doing this)

Another small pro: it would make things simpler for the newcomers. At
the risk of opening up a previous discussion, would this allow us to
simplify CG 1.1.2 - 1.1.3 to 'git clone' ?
My $0.02 are in favour of the merge.

Andrew