[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regression tests
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: regression tests |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:32:08 +0200 |
2007/9/11, Rune Zedeler <address@hidden>:
> > Possibly... but an *automated* page -- containing a listing exactly as
> > Trevor outlined BUT WITH ONLY THE DEFAULT SETTING/VALUE -- would keep up
> > *precisely* with development, since it would be scripted into the main
> > compilation process.
>
> Yep listing default values is easy - I agree - this was not what I was
This is actually pretty hard. Lots of defaults are supplied as arguments in
robust_scm2xxx(grob->get_property("yyy"), DEFAULT)
and there is no mechanism that enforces a uniform default across the
c++ code base.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: regression tests, (continued)
- Re: regression tests, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Valentin Villenave, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Trevor Bača, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Rune Zedeler, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Kieren MacMillan, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Rune Zedeler, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Kieren MacMillan, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: regression tests, Kieren MacMillan, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Trevor Bača, 2007/09/11
- Re: regression tests, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/09/11