Re: LSR categories

[Mats Bengtsson]

Graham Percival wrote:
> > Agree! Often such division into different categories don't help at 
> > all, they just give you more places to search from.
>
> Other than one example (scheme programming), I have no objection to 
> this -- but please don't say "text, lyrics, articulation etc".  I'd 
> like to discuss exact proposals.
Why is scheme programming so special? If I, as an ordinary user, want to 
solve
a certain typesetting problem, I mostly don't have any idea if the 
solution requires
Scheme programming or not and at least as long as the solution can be 
copy/pasted
into my own file as it is, I wouldn't care.

What you probably have in mind is good examples to learn Scheme 
programming,
but unless these examples are very contrived they will also solve some 
practical
typesetting problem.

  /Mats