Re: LSR categories

[Mats Bengtsson]

Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> I feel that these categories are not leading the mind. Users usually 
> wants to make a graphical representation of some music, and not doing 
> scheme, or trick, or whatever.
> For example, many tweaks are ''simple'' ''scheme-trick''s, that 
> (naturally) involves some ''scheme-programming''... I'd better see 
> categories like: text, lyrics, articulation etc.
Agree! Often such division into different categories don't help at all, 
they just
give you more places to search from. No matter how we choose the 
categories,
there will always be a number of examples that don't fit anywhere or 
that fit
perfectly well into several categories. The main thing, in my opinion, 
is that
it's easy to search in all the examples (preferably including Regression 
Tests and
maybe even all examples from the manual) and that it's easy to browse 
through
them all. It's often you search for some feature where you really don't 
know what
word to search for but where it's easy to recognize it in the typeset 
examples,
especially considering that many users don't have English as their 
mother tongue.

  /Mats