[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ehy fonts?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Ehy fonts? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:05:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Rune Zedeler escreveu:
> I serched the archives without finding this question asked.
>
> We hopefully agree that having to trace the fonts is an ugly hack that
> contradicts everything that lilypond stands for.
>
> The natural question is:
> Why use fonts instead of pdf templates?
* philosophically: because the set of glyphs essentially a font
* practically: fonts have
- glyph subsetting,
- hinting,
- specialized libraries (eg Freetype)
- naturally allow for glyphs which are in fact letters (msfzp 1-9)
> Using templates would allow for the metapost-code to be used directly in
> the pdfs.
I think the proper solution is to convert all fonts to outlines, and use
mf2pt1. This bypasses the tracing step. See the archives for more details.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
- Ehy fonts?, Rune Zedeler, 2007/01/19
- Re: Ehy fonts?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: Ehy fonts?, Rune Zedeler, 2007/01/19
- Re: Ehy fonts?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/19
- Re: Ehy fonts?, Rune Zedeler, 2007/01/19
- Re: Ehy fonts?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/19
- Re: Ehy fonts?, Rune Zedeler, 2007/01/19
- Re: Ehy fonts?, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/20
Re: Ehy fonts?, Rune Zedeler, 2007/01/19