[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: purpose of the c wrapper
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: purpose of the c wrapper |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:15:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi Charles,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:20:12AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > (On most w32 systems,
> > a script without an .exe extension would match such a rule as well, but
> > that's not the case for example on GNU/Linux -> w32 cross compiles and
> > with some weird Cygwin mount options.)
>
> ...such as the default (only) mount mode under the upcoming cygwin-1.7
> release.
Ugh. Thanks for the heads-up! I didn't know (or forgot again) Cygwin
was going to go that way.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, (continued)
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/03
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/03
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Charles Wilson, 2009/06/03
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Roumen Petrov, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Charles Wilson, 2009/06/07