[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: purpose of the c wrapper
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: purpose of the c wrapper |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:20:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> (On most w32 systems,
> a script without an .exe extension would match such a rule as well, but
> that's not the case for example on GNU/Linux -> w32 cross compiles and
> with some weird Cygwin mount options.)
...such as the default (only) mount mode under the upcoming cygwin-1.7
release.
--
Chuck
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, (continued)
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/06/01
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/03
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/03
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper,
Charles Wilson <=
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Roumen Petrov, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/04
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Vincent Torri, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/07
- Re: purpose of the c wrapper, Charles Wilson, 2009/06/07