Re: Two small libltdl patches.

[Peter O'Gorman]

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
>> But wasn't there a thread back in June where we explicitly added a bunch
>> of argz functions, so that (a) we would be using the same file as
>> gnulib, and (b) that file would have a complete argz implementation?
> 
> I recall that it was decided that it was not necessary for the
> implementation to be identical to gnulib and that the code should not
> need to be updated unless it is found to be broken.

I just went back and re-read the argz threads on bug-libtool. The two
functions were added back in February, the June thread then decided that
libtool could keep its own argz and only have the functions it needs,
while gnulib's could "evolve along glibc's".

Now that I look at the patch again, I see that I forgot to remove the
functions from argz_.h :)

So, with the functions also removed from the header, ok?

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com