[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Two small libltdl patches.
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: Two small libltdl patches. |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:48:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080708 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On systems without argz we were exporting unmangled symbols argz_count
> and argz_add from libltdl. Not really a good idea. Rather than mangle
> the names, since we do not use either function, they were removed.
But wasn't there a thread back in June where we explicitly added a bunch
of argz functions, so that (a) we would be using the same file as
gnulib, and (b) that file would have a complete argz implementation?
Doesn't your patch fork our copy again? (Or have I missed some
intervening decisions/development)?
--
Chuck
- Two small libltdl patches., Peter O'Gorman, 2008/08/23
- Re: Two small libltdl patches.,
Charles Wilson <=
- Re: Two small libltdl patches., Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/24
- Re: Two small libltdl patches., Peter O'Gorman, 2008/08/24
- Re: Two small libltdl patches., Charles Wilson, 2008/08/25
- Re: Two small libltdl patches., Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/26
- Re: Two small libltdl patches., Peter O'Gorman, 2008/08/26
- Re: Two small libltdl patches., Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/26
Re: Two small libltdl patches., Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/26