[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: distchecking without FC?
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: distchecking without FC? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:02:39 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:52:45PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> Quoting Noah Misch <address@hidden>:
> >On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> >>is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all check
> >>libtool HEAD but not distcheck it? Configure would complain (only
> >>during distcheck) that I don't have a working Fortran compiler.
> >
> >I posted a patch to fix this:
> >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-05/msg00002.html
>
> Thanks for the pointer,
> But I still get:
> checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no
> checking whether accepts -g... no
Ah, you have no F77 compiler either. The patch I posted only works around an
absent `FC' (F95) compiler. Thanks; I'll look at generalizing it.
- distchecking without FC?, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/14
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/14
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/14
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/15
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/06/16
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/17
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/18
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/06/19
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/19
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/06/19