[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:04:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:31:32PM CEST:
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11: All 87 tests passed (12 tests were not run)
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00: All 87 tests passed (12 tests were not run)
> hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20: 3 of 85 tests failed [[All tagdemo-make]]
> mips-sgi-irix6.5: 4 of 99 tests failed [[quote, *-hardcode && *-relink]]
>
> Not too bad so far :-)
i686-pc-linux-gnu: All 99 tests passed
ia64-unknown-linux-gnu: 1 of 99 tests failed [[tagtrace because of
autoconf-2.13]]
i686-pc-linux-gnu with icc/icpc/ifort and GNU ld:
3 of 96 tests failed (12 tests were not run)
The icc failures are mdemo-dryrun and mdemo-make (after non-static
configuration):
icc/icpc/ifort use -version-info internally when calling the linker.
GNU ld does not allow more than one -version-info if one of them has
anonymous symbols. One workaround for C and Fortran code would be not
to add C++ runtime libraries with -no_cpprt. I don't know what the
right solution would be. Is there any similar precendential case?
Furthermore, f77demo-make fails for the non-static configurations with a
./.libs/libmix.so: undefined reference to `MAIN__'
while trying to link cprogram. I'm not sure how to fix this, not being a
Fortran expert.
Regards,
Ralf
Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/10/11
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/10/11
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/10/11
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Albert Chin, 2004/10/11
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/10/11
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Albert Chin, 2004/10/11
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/10/11
- Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/10/12