[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Carefully written essay asking for proportionality for rms
From: |
Jorge P . de Morais Neto |
Subject: |
Re: Carefully written essay asking for proportionality for rms |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:30:59 -0300 |
Hi Miroslav! Good morning from Brazil.
Em [2021-04-08 qui 15:45:54+0200], Miroslav Rovis escreveu:
> After 69 minutes, my mail does not show on:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2021-04/index.html
I did receive an email of yours from 08 Apr 2021 14:36:58, but I just
take a long time to reply. I apologize. And I suppose the mailing list
archives have a delay too.
> Thanks for this work.
You are welcome.
> I read it the first time you posted in this list.
I didn’t remember I had already posted it on this list.
> Firstly, I am unable to view much of
> https://gitlab.com/jorgemorais/justice-for-rms
> Apparently, gitlab.com does not support my Pale Moon browser.
I didn’t know about that. I am considering getting out of gitlab.com.
But what exactly happens when you try to view my page on Pale Moon? And
for curiosity: why do you use Pale Moon instead of GNU IceCat or even
Firefox?
> On this second reading, I found, insofar, that there appears to be a
> (probably) new link, but it does not work:
> https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=fIK5st2s3kA
In the latest version that link was removed anyway (the article was too
long and a bit hard to follow, so I am summarizing it). Anyway, next
time I provide a link to Invidious, I will include a footnote; and in
the footnote, I will provide a link to the video on
the <https://redirect.invidious.io> service.
> Maybe if there be a way to do gradual translation, just as if it were a way to
> somehow further section your work so that, say, a casual reader can only read
> a
> complete but short part, and the translator can, at first, translate just that
> complete short part, and the info that get/provide-by-translation is still not
> partial? And then you offer all the details separately because all those
> details are worthy.
Thank you for the suggestion. I will think about it. A complementary
approach could be moving more details into footnotes.
Regards
--
- <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/>
- I am Brazilian. I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback.
- Free Software Supporter: <https://www.fsf.org/free-software-supporter>
- If an email of mine arrives at your spam box, please notify me.