[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libredwg] LibreDWG Merge
From: |
pitanga |
Subject: |
Re: [libredwg] LibreDWG Merge |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:35:36 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Yes, we do need to merge.
The key point here is to freeze the API before we release.
Although, we need to have Gagan and Avneet's papers signed before we merge. Did
you sign anything?
On Dom, 08 Dez 2013, gagan wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I was working on LibreDWG based DWG to DXF converter but I feel like
> all the branches should be merged into our master branch so that I
> could make the full use of our projects too. Moreover I think we
> should have a release now. 3 GSoC projects have been done and library
> is not yet released which I feel is not good. :-(
>
> Need suggestions from all.
>
> --
> Thanks
> Gaganjyot
> http://codeify.wordpress.com
> "Jai Sai Naath"
--
Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva ☂
http://metamaquina.com.br
http://garoa.net.br
http://polignu.org
http://gnu.org
- Re: [libredwg] LibreDWG Merge,
pitanga <=
- Re: [libredwg] LibreDWG Merge, Avneet Kaur, 2014/02/10
- Re: [libredwg] LibreDWG Merge, .Org.Com, 2014/02/10
- Re: [libredwg] Release plan (was: LibreDWG Merge), gagan, 2014/02/17
- Re: [libredwg] Release plan (was: LibreDWG Merge), Avneet Kaur, 2014/02/17
- Re: [libredwg] Release plan (was: LibreDWG Merge), gagan, 2014/02/17
- Re: [libredwg] Release plan (was: LibreDWG Merge), Avneet Kaur, 2014/02/17