[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libcvd-members] windows project file changes
From: |
Gerhard Reitmayr |
Subject: |
Re: [libcvd-members] windows project file changes |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:17 +0200 |
On 23 Jul 2009, at 21:37, E. Rosten wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Gerhard Reitmayr wrote:
my question was about something else(sort of)... I think Georg's
question side tracked the discussion...
the issue is not so much how to compile libcvd, its more how to
compile other programs that need access to headers and libs from:
-libcvd
-jpeg
-pthreads-win32
-gvars
-tag
-lapack
-...
so, its more about putting some infrastructure in place to make
life easier for other stuff. yes, using configure could do that for
our libs but I guess the solution I worked out in the project files
and a simple batch script was easier than making configure work.
for other programs that never used configure, its not really an
option.
So if I get it correctly, the thing is that there's no general
equivalent to a standard install place on Window, so you have to set
up a bunch of header and linker paths to point to every library when
you want to compile against libcvd.
yes, exactly. the concept of an install location doesn't exist on
windows as one never installs headers or libraries on most windows
machines...
So, the solution is to make libCVD on Windows do a make install step
which copies all the other libraries in to a handy place, so
compiling programs is easier?
almost, its to make all our libs (more than libcvd) do that so at
least these are taken care of. but yes, that is the gist of it.
yes, generating project files is possible, others do it. still it
doesn't change my suggestion, because you also need to generate the
mechanisms to copy the stuff to an install location unless you want
to work mixed (jump between VC to compile and cmd line to install).
so anyway, I have a reasonable working solution (as described) and
wanted to know, if there are any objections against checking it in ?
No objections, even if I've completely misunderstood.
yes, will do it when time permits.
cheers,
Gerhard
-Ed
--
(You can't go wrong with psycho-rats.)(http://mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~er258)
/d{def}def/f{/Times s selectfont}d/s{11}d/r{roll}d f 2/m{moveto}d -1
r 230 350 m 0 1 179{ 1 index show 88 rotate 4 mul 0 rmoveto}for/s 12
d f pop 235 420 translate 0 0 moveto 1 2 scale show showpage
--
Gerhard Reitmayr
MIL, Engineering Department, Cambridge University
http://mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~gr281/