[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDL issue
|
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
|
Subject: |
Re: IDL issue |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:18:21 -0400 |
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 21:11 +0200, Tom Bachmann wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Espen Skoglund wrote:
> > The one
> > argument I can think of in favour of returning the result value is a
> > performance related one. The architecture calling conventions [...]
>
> These stubs are supposed to be inline anyway, I guess. This wouldn't
> matter then.
That seems likely to me as well. Note, however, that inlining stubs is
not obviously an optimization...
--
Jonathan S. Shapiro, Ph.D.
Managing Director
The EROS Group, LLC
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, (continued)
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/07/10
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/07/11
- Re: IDL issue - struct return vs. cap return, Sam Mason, 2007/07/10
Re: IDL issue, Tom Bachmann, 2007/07/09
- Re: IDL issue,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=