[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hurd on L4 Project

From: Neal H Walfield
Subject: Re: Hurd on L4 Project
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 11:26:45 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7

> How much danger is there that we'd end up with a fork of the Hurd
> codebase if we did something like this.

I would imagine minimal.

> Additionally, I've been looking at BitKeeper lately for source control.
> Has anyone tried it? It looks like a nice combination of CVS and
> Clearcase. It works distributed and disconnected like CVS, but has a
> branching and merging scheme more like Clearcase.

This is non-free.

> I looked on sourceforge and I don't see anything like that in the
> projects. I can submit one if needed. However, what is the relationship
> between Sourceforge and Savannah? It seems to me that Savannah is
> duplication of effort with regards to Sourceforge. Are they just worried
> about Sourceforge going away some day?

Sourcefourge is owned by VALinux; Savannah is managed by the FSF.  The
latter was created in response to VALinux introducing proprietary

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]