[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?
From: |
Adam Sjøgren |
Subject: |
Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:42:46 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b29 (linux) |
On Tue, 18 May 2010 10:01:36 +0100, Uday wrote:
> Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be> writes:
>>> The primary method isn't prefixed. The secondary ones are.
>> Prefixed? Huh? In which way?
[...]
> I suppose what he means is that running `M-x gnus' connects to the
> primary method, but giving a prefix argument `C-u M-x gnus' allows you
> to connect to the other methods. You have to type in the method you
> want to connect to and the group name in the minibuffer.
Actually that wasn't what I meant - I meant whether you qualify
groupnames with "method+server:" or not.
These days I guess the split, and specialness of the primary method,
seem a little outdated, but there you go. At work I use nnnil for the
primary method :-)
Best regards,
--
"What looks large from a distance Adam Sjøgren
Close up is never that big" asjo@koldfront.dk
- Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?, Tassilo Horn, 2010/12/09
- Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/09
- Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?,
Adam Sjøgren <=
- Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?, Tassilo Horn, 2010/12/10
Re: Gnus works `at it is' but isn't that a coincidence?, Tassilo Horn, 2010/12/09