[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2011 05:24:58 -0700 (PDT) |
--- On Fri, 8/5/11, Martin.Hepperle <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Martin.Hepperle <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?
> To: address@hidden
> Date: Friday, August 5, 2011, 5:13 AM
> Hmmm...this is what I get under
> Windows ("official" MINGW binary):
>
> octave-3.2.4.exe:53> foo
> foo =
>
> {
> [1,1] = a
> [1,2] = ab
> [1,3] = abc
> [1,4] =
>
> 1 2 3
> 4
> 5 6 7
> 8
>
> 9 10 11 12
>
> }
>
> octave-3.2.4.exe:54> numel(foo)
> ans = 4
> octave-3.2.4.exe:55> numel(foo{:})
> error: Invalid call to numel. Correct usage is:
>
> -- Built-in Function: numel (A)
>
>
> Additional help for built-in functions and operators is
> available in the on-line version of the manual. Use
> the command
> `doc <topic>' to search the manual index.
>
> Help and information about Octave is also available on the
> WWW
> at http://www.octave.org and via the address@hidden
> mailing list.
> octave-3.2.4.exe:55>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/numel-foo-feature-or-bug-tp3720972p3721042.html
> Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
Please note that:
1) you are using version 3.2.4 while I am using 3.4.2, i.e. mine is later;
2) I run Linux while you Windows.
Anyway, I think 2) is irrelevant is this case, i.e. I think it's a
regression in 3.4.2 rather than Linux <-> Windows issue.
Thanks,
Sergei.
- numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Martin.Hepperle, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?,
Sergei Steshenko <=
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, PhilipNienhuis, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/07
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/07