[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?
From: |
Martin.Hepperle |
Subject: |
Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2011 05:13:14 -0700 (PDT) |
Hmmm...this is what I get under Windows ("official" MINGW binary):
octave-3.2.4.exe:53> foo
foo =
{
[1,1] = a
[1,2] = ab
[1,3] = abc
[1,4] =
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
}
octave-3.2.4.exe:54> numel(foo)
ans = 4
octave-3.2.4.exe:55> numel(foo{:})
error: Invalid call to numel. Correct usage is:
-- Built-in Function: numel (A)
Additional help for built-in functions and operators is
available in the on-line version of the manual. Use the command
`doc <topic>' to search the manual index.
Help and information about Octave is also available on the WWW
at http://www.octave.org and via the address@hidden
mailing list.
octave-3.2.4.exe:55>
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/numel-foo-feature-or-bug-tp3720972p3721042.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?,
Martin.Hepperle <=
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, PhilipNienhuis, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/07