[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sqp syntax
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Re: sqp syntax |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:40:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:21:48PM +0100, Olivier Lefevre wrote:
> I don't understand the sqp calling conventions.
>
> 1) The docs say the second argument is either a
> function handle which it calls phi or a 2- or
> 3-element cell array of function handles which
> it calls phi, h and g. But at the top we are
> show the syntax sqp(x0, phi), sqp(x0, phi, g)
> or sqp(x0, phi, g, h).
These g and h are not the same g and h as in the 2- or 3-element cell
array.
> Shouldn't the last two
> be qp(x0, [phi; g]) and sqp(x0, [phi; g; h])
> instead?
>
> 2) It then goes on to call the 3rd to 6th arguments
> cef, cif, lb and lu but the next syntax example
> is sqp(x0, phi, g, h, lb, ub). Where did cef and
> cif go???
cef and ci mean g and h in sqp(x0, phi, g, h, lb, ub)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- O.L.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
- sqp syntax, Olivier Lefevre, 2011/02/16
- Re: sqp syntax,
Olaf Till <=