[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Catching up to Matlab
From: |
Judd Storrs |
Subject: |
Re: Catching up to Matlab |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:00:27 -0400 |
2010/11/1 Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden>:
> so from Octave documentation how do I at all know in the first place
> that 'set' exists in Matlab ?
I sort of see your point, but assuming someone puts in the effort to
go through and document the implementation differences, how do you
propose to keep that up to date with future Matlab releases? Incorrect
documentation is infinitely worse than no documentation.
Frankly, you've demonstrated how easy it already is to compare
octave's documentation to Matlab's. Who's time are you volunteering
for this Yours?
--judd
- Catching up to Matlab, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/01
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2010/11/01
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/01
- Re: Catching up to Matlab,
Judd Storrs <=
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2010/11/02
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, John W. Eaton, 2010/11/02
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2010/11/04
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/11/14
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2010/11/15
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/15
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Ozzy Lash, 2010/11/15
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2010/11/16
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Ozzy Lash, 2010/11/16
- Re: Catching up to Matlab, Thomas Weber, 2010/11/16