[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2008 11:04:52 -0500 |
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:50 AM, HempyElmo <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a Matlab code which I want to run on Octave. With Matlab this
> program takes about 5 minutes under Windows XP on a Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
> to make an output .mat. With Octave on the same computer, it took ages...
> maybe 30 times more processing time. Same thing happens for Octave with the
> same version (2.9.15) on a Linux machine (Intel Xeon 2.8 GHz). Is anybody
> have a reason why? Is it because of Octave or the code itself?
>
> The code reproduce a particle in cells simulation. I don't know how many
> loops it makes.
>
It is always a good idea to read FAQ prior to posting. Please read:
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/FAQ.html
In particular, note section 10 "Porting programs from Matlab to Octave"
Regards,
Dmitri.
--
- Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, HempyElmo, 2008/05/29
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Stuart Brorson, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Michael Goffioul, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, David Bateman, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time,
Dmitri A. Sergatskov <=
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, HempyElmo, 2008/05/30